A Will Modified Against Your Will? What Can You Do?
- What Is A Codicil?
The word “codicil” is an expression from notarial practice, referring to provisions amending an earlier will or containing clarifications or new provisions that were not in the original deed. In other words, a codicil will modify or amend provisions that are already in the original will. It often proves to be a simpler and more effective alternative to drafting a new will.
Frequently, by means of a codicil, individuals will add or remove beneficiaries, modify the shares of their estates, add, modify, or remove conditions regarding the granting of inheritance, etc.
The codicil is subject to the same formalities as the will.
There are 3 types of codicil:
- Notarized codicil
- Holograph codicil
- Codicil in presence of witness
- What Are the Formalities
- Notarized Codicil
Persuant to C.c.Q., art. 716 :
« a notarial [codicil] is executed by a notary, en minute, in the presence of a witness or, in certain cases, two witnesses. The date and place of the making of the [codicil] shall be noted on the [codicil].
The codicil must also satisfy the requirements of C.c.Q., art. 717 :
« A notarial [codicil] is read by the notary to the testator alone or, if the testator chooses, in the presence of a witness. Once the reading is done, the testator shall declare in the presence of the witness that the act read contains the expression of his last wishes. The will is then signed by the testator, the witness or witnesses and the notary, in each other’s presence.
- Holograph Codicil
Under article 726 of the Civil Code, the holograph codicil must be entirely written by the testator and signed by him. If the testator is unable to sign it, he may do so otherwise, but only by technical means. The holograph codicil is not subject to any other specific form.
It should be noted that the formal declaration by the testator that the written document is his will is not an essential formality, but in case of doubt regarding the authenticity of the procedures, it may become essential.
- Codicil in Presence of Witnesses
Persuant to C.c.Q., art. 727 :
A [codicil] made in the presence of witness is written by the testator or by a third person.
The testator then declares in the presence of two witnesses of full age that the document he is presenting is his [codicil]. He need not divulge its contents. He signs it at the end or, if he has already signed it, acknowledges his signature; he may also cause a third person to sign it for him in his presence and according to his instructions.
The witnesses sign the [codicil] forthwith in the presence of the testator.
- Recognition of a Codicil
There is no specific formality except what is stipulated in the Civil Code.
The signature of the codicil must be carried by the testator himself. On the other hand, the case law has established precedents where, if it was impossible to sign by himself, the testator had been assisted by a third party, in front of witnesses.
Le testateur qui ne peut PAS signer peut néanmoins rédiger un testament devant témoins. Il doit alors demander à un tiers de le signer pour lui, en sa présence et suivant ses instructions [art. 727 al. 2 C.c.Q.]. Ce tiers peut être l’un des témoins au testament ou une autre personne. La demande du testateur et la signature par le tiers devraient idéalement avoir lieu en présence des témoins.
Mentionnons que la cour d’appel a déjà reconnu la validité d’un testament devant témoins qui avait été signé par la testatrice avec l’aide de la légataire qui lui avait tenu la main pour l’aider à compléter la signature de son nom. Comme il ne s’agissait que d’une aide matérielle rendu nécessaire en raison de la faiblesse physique de la testatrice, la cour a considéré que l’exigence de signature prévue par la loi avait été respectée.
The holograph codicil must be written, but it can be written by a third party as well as by the testator himself . It can be written by any technical means such as a typed document, and the court saw no reason to refuse a printed form. The paper you write on does not matter.
- In Presence of Witness
For a codicil in the presence of witnesses to be recognized as valid and legally binding, it must meet three (3) criteria :
- It must be done in the presence of two full age witnesses,
- The testator must officially declare that the contents of the document which he presents have not been disclosed, and that it is indeed his will,
- The codicil must be signed by the witnesses, as soon as it they have been presented with the said document, in the presence of the testator.
The codicil must be signed in the presence of two disinterested witnesses and the testator; the three people must be present simultaneously during the procedure, from beginning to end, failing to satisfy this criterion will lead to the codicil being declared as void. A third party who bears the title of mandatary of the testator, or of universal legatee, cannot be considered as a disinterested person or a third party.
Before the two witnesses can sign the codicil, it is imperative that the tester signs it himself. If the codicil is already signed when it is presented to the witnesses, the testator must be able to prove that the signature on the document is indeed his own and that it is authentic. The recognition of the testator’s signature, in front of two witnesses, is an essential formality that renders the codicil null and void if it is not respected.
The codicil also lapses when it is proven that the witnesses signed without the presence of the testator and that the testator also signed without the presence of the witnesses. Indeed, in Bank of Nova Scotia Trust Company and Flanagan Smith, 2014 QCCS 6244, a dispute represented by our firm,
Le deuxième témoin, selon le codicille, a signé plus tard le même jour en l’absence de Mme [X].
In Gingras v. Gingras, the court voided the codicil on the grounds that the Supreme Court considered it an essential condition for the validity of the will in the presence of witnesses, that the testator signs and that the two witnesses sign immediately in the presence of the testator.
The mere physical presence of the two witnesses before the testator cannot replace their signature. Indeed, in another Patton case, a codicil with only one signature was declared to be a document that:
Does not meet the requirements of article 727 C.C.Q. for wills made in the presence of witnesses.
- Other considerations
When there are several pages, the codicil must be numbered. The original must be kept and when the codicil is reproduced, it must always be accompanied by the original, otherwise it will have no legal value. In addition, under article 714 of the C.C.Q., the testator must mention that he is signing his will or codicil, and that the document represents his last wishes.
C.c.Q., art. 714 stipulates :
A holograph [codicil] or [codicil] made in the presence of witnesses that does not fully meet the requirements of that form is valid nevertheless if it meets the essential requirements thereof and if it unquestionably and unequivocally contains the last wishes of the deceased.
An example of a void testament on the basis that the testament was not drafted by a disinterested third party goes as follows : the deceased, Mr. du Roscoat, left a will signed in the presence of witnesses, made the day before his death, in which he designated the Plaintiff to act as liquidator of his estate. He also appoints him as legatee of his property with three other persons. The will was written and signed by the Defendant Perusick, the Plaintiff’s spouse and also a legatee, at the testator’s request. A brother and a friend of the deceased and one of the witnesses dispute the validity of the will. Indeed, the drafter of a will cannot be a legatee of the deceased’s estate. This is an interested person who, according to the Court of Appeal, cannot be considered a third party within the meaning of article 727 of the Civil Code of Québec. The person who writes the will cannot benefit from any legacy whatsoever. The will is therefore void and cannot be verified.
- Essential conditions
Under section 727, the testator is not required to disclose the contents of his will to his witnesses. Indeed, Article 727 only specifies the essential characteristics of the signature procedure and not the substantive conditions. The codicil will simply have to contain the elements added or modified from the previous will.
For further information regarding the content of a will or codicil, please visit : https://schneiderlegal.com/planning-a-last-will-and-testament/
- I Want to Contest a Codicil, What Should I Do?
After a demand of homologation of a codicil is made, it is possible to contest it either by:
1- Contestation by affidavit in response to the demand of homologation, where applicable, of a codicil before witnesses or holographs; or by
2- Contestation of an authentic deed, entitled registration of forgeries, where applicable, of a notarial codicil
It should be noted that contesting the testator’s incapacity when drafting a will or codicil is not considered as a justification or a case of contesting the codicil’s probate. Indeed, in Simco (Succession of), the court confirmed that
It is not the role of the court on probate to examine the validity of the disposition by detremining, for example, whether the testator was of sound of mind or whether she subsequently revoked the gift.
For more information regarding the probate of a will please visit : https://schneiderlegal.com/probate-of-wills/
 C.c.Q., art. 716
 C.c.Q., art. 726
 Boisvert (Succession de), AZ-50278563.
 C.c.Q., art. 727.
 Droit des successions, Jacques Beaulne, Ed. 5, p. 304.
 Lemaine (Succession de), 2010 QCCS 6309.
 Didone c. Didone-Gagnon, J.E. 94-1772, EYB 1994-28917 (C.A.)
 Commentaires sur l’article 727 C.c.Q. par Christine Morin. EYB2011DCQ199, Éditions Yvon Blais, p. 6.
 C.c.Q., art. 727.
 Coulombe c. Alix, 2016 QCCS 1550.
 Les publications du Québec, 1993, Ministère de la Justice, Commentaires du ministre de la Justice – Le Code civil du Québec, t. 1.
 Gingras c. Gingras,  R.C.S. 339.
 Diotte (Succession de) c. Bissonette, 2016 QCCS 2461 et Lemaine (Succession de), 2012 QCCA 1371.
 Germain (Succession de), 2013 QCCS 5794.
 Gingras c. Gingras,  R.C.S. 339.
 Patton (Succession de), AZ-50168243.
 Id, .
 Audet c. Tremblay,  C.A. 585
 Droit des successions, Jacques Beaulne, Ed. 5, p. 311.
 Fagault (Succession de), 2016 QCCS 1899.
 Du Roscoat (Succession de), 2016 QCCS 4708.
 2015 QCCS 333
If you are looking for a law firm with reasonable rates, quick and efficient turnaround time for your files and who provides personalized and effective follow-ups, call Schneider Attorneys at (514) 439-1322 ext. 112 or email us at email@example.com
The above noted text should not be construed as providing legal advice or a statement of your claim. The process highlighted above are merely parameters and barometers and do not constitute any warranties and guaranties with regards to your file at hand. We strongly recommend that you seek legal advice with a licensed attorney from the Barreau du Quebec or a notary at the Chambre des Notaires. Each case must be seen and analysed on its merits as the legal process may be complex and cumbersome.